Intel UHD Graphics 605 versus AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon R5 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel UHD Graphics 605

versus

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 605

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 15 Watt
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 versus 1363
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 versus 1915
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 versus 1363
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 versus 1915

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	11 December 2017 versus 31 May 2016
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt versus 15 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1643 versus 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1961 versus 1915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1643 versus 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1961 versus 1915

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

14.2x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 18
2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2981 versus 1458
Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 versus 4.247
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 52.728
Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.312
3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 3.355
10.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 4.219
Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 724
Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 724

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	256 versus 18
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	2981 versus 1458
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331 versus 4.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568 versus 52.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543 versus 0.312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649 versus 3.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459 versus 4.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966 versus 724
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966 versus 724

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1458

2981

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.247

6.331

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

52.728

119.568

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.312

0.543

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.355

12.649

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.219

42.459

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

966

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1643

1363

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1961

1915

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

966

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1643

1363

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1961

1915

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 605	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark	369
PassMark - G2D Mark	106
Geekbench - OpenCL	1458	2981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.247	6.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	52.728	119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.312	0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.355	12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.219	42.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	724	966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1643	1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1961	1915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	724	966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1643	1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1961	1915

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 605	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	Gemini Lake GT1	Wani
Date de sortie	11 December 2017	31 May 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1550	1551
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	800 MHz	800 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	200 MHz	200 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	18	256
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt	15 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	2,410 million
Performance á point flottant		388.1 gflops
Taux de remplissage de la texture		12.13 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	IGP
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit
Genre de mémoire	DDR4 / LPDDR4	System Shared
Mémoire partagé	1
Technologies
Quick Sync