Intel UHD Graphics 610 versus Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 30 August 2016 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 versus 693
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 versus 171
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 versus 2697
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 versus 1071
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 versus 1071
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 1241
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 1241
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 1699
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 1699
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 versus 693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 versus 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 versus 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 versus 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 versus 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 1699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 4554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 30 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1350 | 1216 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 24 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 610 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9000
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9800
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon 660M
