Intel UHD Graphics 610 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 645 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 32 Watt
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 645 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 32 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 931 versus 693
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 204 versus 171
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3186 versus 2697
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1476 versus 1071
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1476 versus 1071
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 versus 1241
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 versus 1241
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2580 versus 1699
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2580 versus 1699
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 931 versus 693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 204 versus 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3186 versus 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1476 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1476 versus 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 versus 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 versus 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2580 versus 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2580 versus 1699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 931 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 204 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 3186 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2580 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2580 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.972 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.381 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT1 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1350 | 1352 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 645 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 32 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |