Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 13.0 billion / sec
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 311.04 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 774
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 237
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 2626
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 6.139
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 171.053
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.65
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 9.729
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 19.871
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 1208
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3275
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 1208
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3275
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 1 February 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 13.0 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops versus 311.04 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 versus 774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 2626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3275 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 4.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 24
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 versus 1596
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 versus 1596
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 versus 24 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 versus 1596 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 2626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3275 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 1 February 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1342 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $69.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire config standard par GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |