Intel UHD Graphics 617 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 617 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 617
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.20 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.20 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4652 versus 3291
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 1313
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 1313
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1461
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1461
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 1633
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 1633
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 versus 231
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1239 versus 870
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4652 versus 3291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 versus 231 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1239 versus 870 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3291 | 4652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 3309 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 | 300 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 870 | 1239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Amber Lake GT2 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1227 | 1228 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.20 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 617 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
