Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- Environ 60% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 1096
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 151
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 22.848
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 162.594
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 1.237
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3191
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3191
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 versus 1096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 1.237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3191 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 87% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5771 versus 4657
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 20.323
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 versus 29.327
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 versus 1870
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 versus 1596
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 versus 1870
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 versus 1596
- 7.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5771 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 versus 1596 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 1096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 151 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 5771 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 1.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 21.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 95.545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3191 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1235 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
