Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- Environ 60% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1239 versus 1096
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 versus 151
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 22.848
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 162.594
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 1.237
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3191
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3191
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1239 versus 1096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 versus 151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 1.237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3191 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 87% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5745 versus 4654
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 20.323
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 versus 29.327
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 versus 1870
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 versus 1596
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 versus 1870
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 versus 1596
- 7.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 versus 4654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 versus 1596 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1239 | 1096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 | 151 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4654 | 5745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 1.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 21.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 95.545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3191 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1246 | 1248 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
