Intel UHD Graphics 730 versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 730 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 48
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 versus 357
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 versus 1884
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 versus 1884
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 versus 357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 versus 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 versus 1884 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1721 versus 1573
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7356 versus 5967
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 versus 2429
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3309
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 versus 2429
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3309
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 619 versus 603
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 versus 1573 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 versus 5967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 versus 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 versus 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 versus 603 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 1721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 7356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 633 | 1031 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 24 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.60 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 730 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFireGL V3100
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 500M
