Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 357
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 1884
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 1884
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 1 September 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 1884 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1721 vs 1573
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7356 vs 5967
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3309
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3309
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 619 vs 603
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 vs 1573 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 vs 5967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 vs 603 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 1721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 7356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 2021 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 633 | 1031 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |