Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 32 versus 24
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1887 versus 1397
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1887 versus 1397
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 versus 878
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 2227
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 2227
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 32 versus 24 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 2227 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 25 Watt
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 25 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2227 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 859 | 1380 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 24 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | 1 |
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIFirePro V5800
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon 540
