Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus AMD Radeon Vega 11
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and AMD Radeon Vega 11 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 versus 2475
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 versus 2475
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 13 February 2018 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 versus 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 22x plus de pipelines: 704 versus 32
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2156 versus 1887
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2156 versus 1887
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 704 versus 32 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 versus 1887 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1847 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | Owl |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 13 February 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 895 | 897 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 704 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.2 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | System Shared |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1250
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7200
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
