NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus AMD Radeon R7 M370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and AMD Radeon R7 M370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 993 MHz versus 960 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 23.83 GTexel / s versus 23.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 737.3 gflops
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 versus 1418
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 versus 17.26
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 versus 1.653
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 versus 70.174
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 versus 1747
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 versus 1484
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2449
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 versus 1747
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 versus 1484
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2449
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 5 May 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz versus 960 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s versus 23.04 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 737.3 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 versus 1418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 versus 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 versus 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 versus 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 versus 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 versus 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 versus 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 versus 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2449 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M370
- 3.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 172
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7070 versus 6325
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 versus 312.94
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 versus 27.833
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 172 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7070 versus 6325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 versus 312.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 versus 27.833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 1418 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 676 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 7070 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 476.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 30.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2449 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM108 | Litho |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 933 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 23.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2500M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 A330
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
