NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus AMD Radeon R7 M445
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and AMD Radeon R7 M445 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 993 MHz versus 920 MHz
- Environ 30% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 23.83 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 30% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 588.8 gflops
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 15-25 Watt
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 versus 939
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 versus 5361
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 versus 15.765
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.94 versus 278.624
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 versus 1.268
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 versus 24.335
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 versus 54.067
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 versus 1913
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 versus 2138
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 1853
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 versus 1913
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 versus 2138
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 1853
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 15 May 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz versus 920 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 588.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 15-25 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 versus 939 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 versus 5361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 versus 15.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 versus 278.624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 versus 1.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 versus 24.335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 versus 54.067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 versus 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 versus 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 versus 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 versus 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 1853 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 versus 172
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 versus 172 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M445
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M445 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 939 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 5361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 15.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 278.624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 1.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 24.335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 54.067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1853 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | GM108 | Meso |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 1296 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 920 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 780 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 15-25 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |