NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 1200x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 1749
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 368
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 4493
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 12.582
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.373 versus 1.254
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.937 versus 18.386
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 23.499
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 2663
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 3478
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 2663
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 3478
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 27 November 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 versus 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3478 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 170.785
- 15.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 35
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 170.785 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 35 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 27 November 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | $109 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 1003 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | $144.81 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | 16.05 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 64 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin |