NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 928 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 1200x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 versus 408
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9706 versus 7902
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 23.168
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 47.404
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1083 versus 881
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 9 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 928 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 versus 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 versus 7902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 47.404 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1083 versus 881 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2522 versus 2473
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 170.785
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 versus 1.373
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 versus 18.937
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3684
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3684
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2522 versus 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 versus 1.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 versus 18.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 versus 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 versus 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 3331 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2473 | 2522 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 | 7902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 592.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 47.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1083 | 881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 9 October 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 862 | 865 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | $169.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | 18.72 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 928 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 110 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec | |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin |