NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Quadro K420
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro K420 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 876 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 37% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 41 Watt
- 2048x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
- 3.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 733
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 288
- 5.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 1843
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 6
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.373 versus 0.433
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.937 versus 10.365
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 17.75
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 1245
- 6.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 598
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 1241
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 1245
- 6.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 598
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 1241
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 22 July 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 876 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 41 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 versus 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 versus 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 1241 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K420
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 186.605 versus 170.785
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 versus 170.785 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 1241 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | $96.67 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 1467 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | $89.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | 10.27 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 876 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 41 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB / 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 160 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) |