NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 14.43 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 160
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 280.0 gflops
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 263
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 174
- 3.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 versus 872
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 2.021
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 versus 104.327
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 versus 0.239
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.415 versus 5.628
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 23.365
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 672
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1078
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 2093
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 672
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1078
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 2093
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 23 July 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s versus 7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 160 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 280.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 versus 872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 2.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 versus 104.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 versus 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 versus 5.628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 23.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 2093 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 875 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 2.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 104.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 5.628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 23.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2093 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Caicos |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1541 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 875 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 280.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 370 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |