NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 14.43 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
- 13.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 630
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 8.844
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.415 versus 10.385
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 12.361
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 988
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 2808
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 988
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 2808
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 327 versus 194
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 630 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 253
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 2902
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 166.832
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.817
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 1693
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 1693 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1359 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |