NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Environ 31% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 23.651
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1790
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1427
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 2153
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1790
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1427
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 2153
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 2153 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 versus 830
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 versus 253
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4271 versus 2902
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 versus 10.872
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 versus 166.832
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.023 versus 0.817
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 versus 12.415
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 versus 12.415 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 versus 327 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Nom de code | GF108 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 29 May 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1270 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $94.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 18.87 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 993 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |