NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA TITAN Xp pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1405 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 11408 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 2513.321
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 43.083
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3686
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3686
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 6 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1405 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 11408 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 2513.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 43.083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 versus 12906
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 versus 807
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 72354 versus 60872
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 versus 208.608
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 versus 16.447
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 versus 926.614
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10120 versus 6273
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 versus 12906 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 versus 807 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72354 versus 60872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 versus 208.608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 versus 16.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 versus 926.614 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10120 versus 6273 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12906 | 17881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60872 | 72354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 256.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 2513.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 19.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 43.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1139.382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6273 | 10120 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 6 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $1,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 210 | 212 |
Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $1,200 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 15.97 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X |