NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62624 versus 61445
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 16952
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 16952
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 22 February 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 versus 61445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 16952 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Environ 4% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12931 versus 12776
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 187.131
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 2548.187
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 15.882
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 117.673
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 901.388
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6261 versus 5978
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 versus 12776 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 810 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 187.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 2548.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 117.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6261 versus 5978 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 12931 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | 61445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 208.608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 16.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 145.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 926.614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 6261 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $279 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 200 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 229 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
