NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1257 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1340 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 versus 8827
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 versus 767
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 versus 39028
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 versus 116.142
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 versus 1022.932
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 versus 9.235
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 versus 84.034
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 versus 607.721
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 11281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3695
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 11281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3695
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1065 versus 1005
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1257 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1340 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 versus 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 versus 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 versus 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 versus 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 versus 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 versus 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 versus 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 versus 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 versus 1005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 258 | 341 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 8000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |