NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 811 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 63.76 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec
- Environ 33% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,530 gflops versus 1,154 gflops
- Environ 43% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2800 versus 1967
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 versus 328
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8613 versus 6174
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 versus 20.831
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 versus 3396
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 versus 3396
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 1 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops versus 1,154 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2800 versus 1967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 versus 328 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8613 versus 6174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 versus 20.831 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 versus 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 versus 3396 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 3651
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 3331
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 3651
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 3331
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3331 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2800 | 1967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 328 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8613 | 6174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | 20.831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 819 | 821 |
Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz | 600 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | large |
Options SLI | 1 | 2-way |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | 67.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |