NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 925 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 300 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 versus 22 December 2011 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2284 versus 2276 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 72 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 1024
- Environ 57% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 2,413 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 196.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1375 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 18655
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 versus 73.733
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 versus 792.44
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 versus 4.888
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 35.338
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 versus 200.825
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 versus 7218
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 versus 7218
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 72 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 2,413 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1375 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 18655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.413 versus 73.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 versus 792.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 versus 4.888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 35.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 versus 200.825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 versus 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 versus 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3335 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6082 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18655 | 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | 84.413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | 1390.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | 7.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | 101.929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2284 | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM206 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 | 22 December 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $549 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 504 | 501 |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 34.63 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 4,313 million |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 274 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 2x | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
ATIFireGL V7300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M GE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 720A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500 XT
