NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 84% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 825 MHz
- Environ 85% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1830 versus 417
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 214 versus 128
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6740 versus 4596
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.591 versus 8.593
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 445.82 versus 143.386
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.736 versus 0.852
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 versus 15.789
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 versus 49.196
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2680 versus 985
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 1927
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2401
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2680 versus 985
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 1927
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2401
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 7 January 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 versus 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 versus 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 versus 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 versus 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 versus 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 versus 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 versus 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 versus 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2401 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2401 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP108 | Jet |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 7 January 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 981 | 1445 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 1,040 million |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16 GB/s | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
