NVIDIA GeForce MX330 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1531 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 63% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1594 MHz versus 980 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 38.26 GTexel/s versus 102.5 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 17x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 250.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) versus 6.0 GB/s
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 10 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1531 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1594 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38.26 GTexel/s versus 102.5 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) versus 6.0 GB/s |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 384
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 versus 10706
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 versus 228
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 versus 2405
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 2784
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 2784
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 3808
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 3808
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 versus 10706 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 versus 228 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 versus 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 versus 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 versus 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 versus 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 versus 3808 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10706 | 15511 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 537 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2405 | 5345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 7038 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 10 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 757 | 554 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $474.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1594 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1531 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38.26 GTexel/s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1800 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX330 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 400
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAT600
