NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 23% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 11408 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 70765 versus 65520
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.337 versus 146.609
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 16138
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3714
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3355
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 16138
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3714
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 4 November 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 11408 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70765 versus 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 versus 146.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 3840 versus 1920
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3131.344
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 21.852
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 135.923
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1141.283
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 7488
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 1920 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1141.283 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 7488 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14150 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70765 | 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 146.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 4303.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 23.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 163.551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1382.954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7488 | 10139 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU106 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 4 November 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $1,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 150 | 215 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s |