NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 20.669
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 15401
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3716
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 4193
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 15401
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3716
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 4193
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 7 December 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 4193 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 1920
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19615 versus 14122
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 899 versus 747
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 155351 versus 71650
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 versus 217.04
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 versus 3119.736
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 21.707
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1141.283
- 2.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3577 versus 1243
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 1920 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19615 versus 14122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 899 versus 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 155351 versus 71650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 versus 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 versus 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1141.283 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3577 versus 1243 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14122 | 19615 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 899 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71650 | 155351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | 3577 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU106 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $2,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 162 | 158 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 3072 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 652.8 GB / s |