NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Environ 88% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1380 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 45% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1590 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10096 versus 7978
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 versus 536
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 versus 13147
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 versus 19139
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 versus 19139
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1380 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1590 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10096 versus 7978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 versus 536 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 versus 13147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 versus 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 versus 19139 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 6319
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 6319
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 5714
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 5714
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 5714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 5714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10096 | 7978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 536 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 | 13147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 | 8060 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 | 8060 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU104B |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 106 | 143 |
Prix maintenant | $699.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1590 MHz | 1095 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1380 MHz | 735 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 2944 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |