NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2944
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19608 versus 18811
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 912
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 117526 versus 102535
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 337.794 versus 326.494
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4566.815 versus 3938.377
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.996 versus 159.275
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 versus 1506.874
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 25500
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 25500
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 versus 2944 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19608 versus 18811 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117526 versus 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 versus 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 versus 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 versus 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 25500 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3716
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3355
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3716
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3355
- 5485x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10970 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 31.631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10970 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19608 | 18811 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117526 | 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 10970 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 109 | 98 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2944 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 496 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |