NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2944
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19514 vs 18750
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 908
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 115804 vs 105219
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 338.122 vs 326.494
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4571.03 vs 3938.377
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.349 vs 159.275
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1653.08 vs 1506.874
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 25500
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 25500
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2944 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 vs 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 vs 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 vs 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 vs 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 vs 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 vs 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 25500 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3716
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3355
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3716
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3355
- 876x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1752 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 31.6 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1752 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 | 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 | 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 1752 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 23 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 110 | 105 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1515 MHz |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2944 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 496 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |