NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 817 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1282 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 30% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2944
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13253 versus 12935
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 589 versus 519
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 330.903 versus 297.996
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.167 versus 22.75
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 versus 19139
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 versus 19139
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 29 January 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 817 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1282 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 2944 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13253 versus 12935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 versus 519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 330.903 versus 297.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 versus 22.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 versus 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 versus 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 versus 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 versus 8905 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 84332 versus 78982
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 versus 3461.767
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 versus 143.293
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1116.69 versus 979.608
- 4.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7784 versus 1821
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 84332 versus 78982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 versus 3461.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 versus 143.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 versus 979.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 8054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 8054 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 versus 1821 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13253 | 12935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 519 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78982 | 84332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 330.903 | 297.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 143.293 | 162.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 8060 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 8060 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1821 | 7784 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU104B |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 144 | 135 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1282 MHz | 1095 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 817 MHz | 735 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 153.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 12000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |