NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1132 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1628 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20509 versus 19824
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 992 versus 848
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 141.066
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 19663
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 19663
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1132 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1628 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20509 versus 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 992 versus 848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 141.066 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Environ 5% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 4864
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 144865 versus 108986
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 versus 323.141
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 versus 1477.456
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 4864 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 144865 versus 108986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 versus 323.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 versus 1477.456 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20509 | 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 992 | 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 108986 | 144865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Nom de code | GA104 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 27 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $8,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 99 | 102 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4864 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1696 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
