NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 296.6 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 26% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 4864
- Environ 74% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 versus 323.141
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 150.943
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 3717
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 3360
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 3717
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 3360
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 1 Dec 2020 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 4864 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 versus 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 150.943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 3360 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4829.953 versus 3552.807
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 31.212
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1477.456 versus 1422.602
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 26295
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 26295
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 versus 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 versus 1422.602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 26295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 26295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 4829.953 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3360 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20469 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11689 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 97 | 99 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |