NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 150.943
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 1 Dec 2020 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 150.943 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1320 MHz
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 199.0 GTexel/s
- Environ 36% de pipelines plus haut: 4864 versus 3584
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 17107
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 971
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 88251
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 299.369
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 4021.382
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 28.778
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 1152.664
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 22495
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 22495
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1961
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1320 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 199.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 3584 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 17107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 971 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1961 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 20394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 2671 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA106 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 104 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |