NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 532.8 GTexel/s versus 505.2 GTexel/s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 10240 versus 3840
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 27212 versus 22310
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1091 versus 972
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 126207
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 versus 432.118
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 versus 41.585
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 versus 2280.457
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 16162
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 16162
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19752 versus 16302
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s versus 505.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10240 versus 3840 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27212 versus 22310 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 versus 972 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 126207 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 versus 432.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 versus 41.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 versus 2280.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 16162 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 versus 16302 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1700 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2105 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 68% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 versus 129.036
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 12 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 versus 129.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27212 | 22310 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 | 972 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 126207 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 432.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 41.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 383.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 2280.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3373 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 | 16302 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Nom de code | GA102 | Navi 21 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1199 | $579 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 49 | 75 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10240 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 26800 million |
Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 912.4 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |