NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 10240 versus 1920
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 27210 versus 14150
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1091 versus 750
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 70765
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 versus 220.337
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 versus 21.852
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 versus 1141.283
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 20094
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 20094
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19752 versus 7488
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 7 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 10240 versus 1920 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27210 versus 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 versus 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 70765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 versus 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 versus 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 versus 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 20094 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 versus 7488 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 11.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3131.344 versus 661.977
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.923 versus 129.036
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3359
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3359
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 versus 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 versus 129.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27210 | 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 70765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 | 7488 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1199 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 49 | 150 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10240 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 912.4 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |