NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 versus 10616
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 versus 592
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 61276
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 485.179 versus 127.622
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.472 versus 18.798
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.036 versus 119.936
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.001 versus 910.721
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 1781
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 13 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 versus 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 versus 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 versus 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 versus 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 versus 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 versus 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 8.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 661.977
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 661.977 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 | 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 13 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1199 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 60 | 270 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10240 | |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 912.4 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 10000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X |