NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti und NVIDIA Tesla T4 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 36% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1365 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Etwa 10% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 10616
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 592
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 61276
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 485.179 vs 127.622
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.472 vs 18.798
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.036 vs 119.936
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.001 vs 910.721
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 14076
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1976
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1781
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 14076
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1976
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1781
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 13 September 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 vs 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 vs 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 vs 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 vs 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 vs 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1781 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 4.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 8.4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 10000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 661.977
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 10000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 661.977 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 | 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Turing |
Codename | GA102 | TU104 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 13 September 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1199 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 60 | 270 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 | |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 912.4 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 10000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X |