NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 3x plus de pipelines: 8704 versus 2944
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 versus 18750
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 versus 908
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 versus 105219
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 versus 326.494
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 versus 3938.377
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 versus 31.684
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 159.275
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 versus 1506.874
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 25500
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 25500
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4420 versus 1752
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 8704 versus 2944 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 versus 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 versus 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 versus 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 versus 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 versus 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 versus 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 25500 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 versus 1752 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 49% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 320 Watt
- 11.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3716
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3356
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3716
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3356
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 320 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 | 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 | 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 | 1752 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 56 | 105 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 10 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 760.3 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |