NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 8704 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 vs 18750
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 908
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 105219
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 326.494
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 3938.377
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 31.684
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 159.275
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1506.874
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 25500
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 25500
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4420 vs 1752
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 vs 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 25500 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 vs 1752 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 49% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 320 Watt
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3716
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3356
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3716
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 | 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 | 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 | 1752 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU104 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 56 | 105 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |