NVIDIA Quadro P4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 760.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7604 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 versus 150.103
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 versus 27.417
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3690
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3690
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 versus 27 May 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 versus 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 versus 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1202 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 277.3 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1792
- Environ 67% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 8,873 gflops versus 5,304 gflops
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 versus 11545
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 versus 795
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 versus 42289
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1590.392
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 11.365
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 751.626
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1560 versus 1115
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1202 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1792 |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops versus 5,304 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 versus 11545 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 versus 795 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 versus 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 751.626 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1560 versus 1115 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 15578 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 887 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 55548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 | 1560 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 | 27 May 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $815 | $599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 281 |
Prix maintenant | $799.99 | $439.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | 43.72 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 165.8 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |