NVIDIA Quadro P4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 950.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7604 MHz versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 versus 150.951
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 versus 28.289
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 versus 710.366
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 versus 13765
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3340
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 versus 13765
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3340
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 versus 10 June 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 versus 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 versus 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 versus 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 versus 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1202 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- Environ 22% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 202.0 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1792
- Environ 22% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,463 gflops versus 5,304 gflops
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13497 versus 11623
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 versus 814
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 47331 versus 42289
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1718.593 versus 1590.392
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 versus 11.365
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6066 versus 4904
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1202 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 202.0 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 1792 |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops versus 5,304 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13497 versus 11623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 versus 814 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47331 versus 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 versus 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 versus 11.365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 versus 4904 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11623 | 13497 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 814 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 47331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 | 6066 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 | 10 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $815 | $379 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 286 | 284 |
Prix maintenant | $799.99 | $359.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | 45.72 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | 6,463 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1920 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 165.8 GTexel / s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |