NVIDIA Quadro P4000 versus NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA Tesla P4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1202 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7604 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 versus 9097
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 versus 391
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 versus 37924
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 versus 147.62
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 versus 9.457
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 versus 523.29
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 versus 11409
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3341
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 versus 11409
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3341
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 versus 13 September 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 versus 9097 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 versus 391 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 versus 37924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 versus 147.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 versus 9.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 versus 523.29 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 versus 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 versus 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3341 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 170.1 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1792
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 5,304 gflops
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 1590.392
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 45.977
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1792 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 5,304 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 45.977 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 9097 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 391 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 37924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 147.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 1791.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 9.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 99.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 523.29 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 | 13 September 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $815 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 349 |
Prix maintenant | $799.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | 5,443 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 165.8 GTexel / s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |