NVIDIA Quadro P600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 85% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1329 MHz versus 719 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.92 GTexel / s versus 11.5 GTexel / s
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,117 gflops versus 552.2 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 4.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 versus 812
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 versus 174
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 versus 2975
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 versus 7.814
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 versus 30.631
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 versus 1654
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 2370
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 versus 1654
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 2370
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 6 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1329 MHz versus 719 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.92 GTexel / s versus 11.5 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,117 gflops versus 552.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 versus 812 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 versus 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 versus 2975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 versus 7.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 versus 30.631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 versus 1654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 versus 1654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
- Environ 21% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 40 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | 812 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 2975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 7.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 30.631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 1654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 1654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.583 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.798 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.854 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GK208 |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 6 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $178 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 556 | 1320 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1557 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1329 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,117 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.92 GTexel / s | 11.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P600 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5830
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
