NVIDIA Quadro P600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1329 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 59% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1557 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 668.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 versus 533
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 versus 86.208
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3686
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3686
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 10 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1329 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1557 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 versus 533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 versus 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3686 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 34.92 GTexel / s
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 384
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,117 gflops
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5332 versus 3318
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15502 versus 11181
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 versus 35.134
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 4662
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 4662
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec versus 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,117 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5332 versus 3318 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15502 versus 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 versus 35.134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 versus 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 versus 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3318 | 5332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 533 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 15502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 10 May 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $178 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 561 | 564 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $474.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.11 | 13.20 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1557 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1329 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,117 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.92 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P600 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
