NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 versus 270.203
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 versus 110.761
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 3358
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 versus 270.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 versus 110.761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 66% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15671 versus 12968
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 702 versus 519
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 84332
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.248 versus 3676.805
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 versus 22.75
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1370.281 versus 1116.69
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 19139
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 19139
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 7784
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15671 versus 12968 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 702 versus 519 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 84332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 versus 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 versus 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 versus 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 19139 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 7784 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12968 | 15671 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 702 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 84332 | 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 270.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3728.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 26.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 110.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1370.281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104B | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 140 | 143 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1095 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |