NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- 8.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 versus 848
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 147317 versus 143963
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 141.066
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1964.377
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 19663
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 19663
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1696 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19862 versus 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 versus 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 147317 versus 143963 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 19663 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1132 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1628 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 versus 401.574
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1132 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1628 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 versus 401.574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3290 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19862 | 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 | 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 147317 | 143963 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU102 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | $8,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 96 | 93 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 870.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |

