NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 und NVIDIA Quadro GV100 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- 8.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 858 vs 848
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 152165 vs 144084
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 141.066
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1964.377
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 19663
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 19663
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 vs 848 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 152165 vs 144084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 141.066 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 1964.377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 19663 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Etwa 13% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1132 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Etwa 36% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1628 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 19278
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 vs 401.574
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3652
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3290
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3652
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3290
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1132 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1628 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 19278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 vs 401.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3290 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19278 | 19824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 | 848 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 152165 | 144084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 562.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 141.066 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1964.377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Volta |
Codename | TU102 | GV100 |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $9,999 | $8,999 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 103 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 1628 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1005 MHz | 1132 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,817 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 | |
Texturfüllrate | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 870.4 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 4096 Bit | |
Speichertyp | HBM2 |