NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 versus 7539
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 versus 380
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 versus 41907
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 152.235
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 1843.045
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 10.681
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 115.607
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 644.098
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 12180
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 12180
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 2 Apr 2020 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 1024 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 versus 7539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 versus 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 versus 41907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 152.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 1843.045 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 10.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 115.607 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 644.098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 12180 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Environ 84% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 735 MHz
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3355
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3355
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 2604
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 2604 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 7539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 41907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 152.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 1843.045 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 10.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 115.607 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 644.098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8062 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 3656 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU117 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 108 | 267 |
Genre | Laptop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 4700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |