NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 versus 134929
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 versus 394.035
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 versus 41.104
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 versus 174.185
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 versus 1987.605
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4665 versus 3537
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 versus 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 versus 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 versus 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 versus 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 versus 1987.605 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4665 versus 3537 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 5.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 versus 4237
- 10.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 versus 86
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 23142
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 23142
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 versus 4237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 versus 86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 23142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 21601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4665 | 3537 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 100 | 91 |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10752 | |
Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 48 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |